One writer’s attempt to make sense of the nonsense, squeeze magnificence from mundanity and beat back the dark one word at a time.
Saturday, February 21, 2009
Is it easier to contemplate war when the cost is censored?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/16/AR2009021601480.html
It still boggles my mind that Bush Sr. had the gall to stop images of fallen soldiers' caskets from being disseminated in the media. And that we've allowed it to continue since he left office! While I understand the idea that families who've lost fathers, mothers, sons, and daughters in the war might not relish seeing flag-draped caskets on the front page of their local paper, I think we OWE it to them to print photos like this, to feel that sick pit of unease in our stomachs at the sight of these ultimate sacrifices. What they DON'T deserve is the weight of the situation being glossed over daily by people who just want to go on living their inane daily lives ignorant of the fact that we are in two wars right now. These are the same people who can't bear to turn on the news for fear of being 'bummed out'. Cry me a river. Literally--if some of my fellow countrymen in the U.S. contemplated the true weight and cost of war, instead of writing people off as casualties in the fight for freedom, maybe there would be a little less war. Just a little...
I know it sounds naive, but I can still dream.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
What business is it of yours if a soldier or marine comes home under a draped coffin? When he or she dies, they are no longer yours to worry about. They are given back to the family...and if the family approves you can gawk at their mis-fortune all you want. What's the matter with you?
ReplyDeleteGary Kiser
AUS Retired
www.trea.org